Life Over Ideology

The Cost of Your Vote

Jun 21, 2025

What if you strip away your citizenship, your political party, your inherited certainties about left and right?

Beneath the noise, you are simply a member of a species struggling to survive on a small planet spinning through an indifferent universe.

From this viewpoint, you can see that political ideologies are nothing more than competing strategies for human survival.

What if we judge these strategies based on their effectiveness in preserving life?

Survival Metrics

In America, extensive peer-reviewed research demonstrates that conservative-governed states consistently exhibit higher mortality rates.

Fully adopting conservative policies nationwide could cost over 217,000 lives annually compared to liberal policies. Conversely, fully liberal policies could save approximately 171,000 lives each year.

Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, and West Virginia consistently rank among states with the shortest life expectancies, systematically resisting public health infrastructure and social safety nets.

Meanwhile, states investing heavily in public health and social support like Hawaii, California, Connecticut, and Massachusetts, boast the highest life expectancies.

Choosing policies that dismantle healthcare and social support, prioritizing abstract ideological purity over human welfare objectively leads to more suffering and death.

Politics is not preference, it’s a choice between life and death.

Political Systems and Human Preservation

While democracies rarely engage in war against each other, democratic nations—especially under conservative governance—have repeatedly launched wars against non-democratic states, often framing these conflicts as defensive necessities for national security or ideological protection.

Liberal administrations are not immune. Historically, when compromised by corporate interests or geopolitical ambitions, they too have pursued aggressive military actions: Vietnam started under Johnson, and Obama significantly expanded drone warfare.

Major recent conflicts highlight a distinct conservative pattern, rooted in nationalist, anti-communist, or anti-terrorist ideologies. Conservative governments and their corporate media allies frequently manipulate public consent through misleading defensive narratives.

Historical examples include Iraq’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction and Vietnam’s Gulf of Tonkin incident, both now widely recognized as deliberate distortions serving deeper economic and ideological interests.

Democratic nations with stronger liberal governance, greater transparency, lower corporate influence, and robust civic participation typically resort to war as a last option, prioritizing diplomacy and collective security.

The "Long Peace" among established democracies post-1945 exemplifies the potential for accountable democratic institutions to sustain international peace.

True democratic accountability demands rigorous scrutiny, transparency, and civic vigilance to resist manipulation into unnecessary, catastrophic conflicts.

The Cost of Extremism

History shows that when political ideologies abandon survival logic, catastrophic extinction-level events become inevitable.

Far-right ultranationalism led humanity into World War II, claiming 70–85 million lives and introducing nuclear annihilation into human history.

Far-left authoritarianism caused catastrophes too. Stalin’s engineered famines killed millions. Mao’s Great Leap Forward starved 30–45 million to death. Pol Pot’s regime exterminated up to 30% of Cambodia’s population.

These were predictable results of placing ideological purity above human life.

Extremism kills deliberately, efficiently, and systematically. Moderation and rejection of extremes are crucial for survival.

The Environmental Imperative

Today’s threats transcend politics.

Climate change disregards economic philosophies. Ocean acidification ignores political party lines. The sixth mass extinction won’t pause for ideological debates.

Environmental action is a species-survival imperative.

Under far-right leadership in Brazil (2019–2022), Amazon deforestation surged to 15-year highs. Within just six months of environmentally-focused leadership in 2023, deforestation dropped by nearly 34%.

Same forest, same economy, same people, but drastically different futures shaped by who the Brazilians voted for.

Your political choices directly influence Earth’s capacity to sustain human life.

Our Moment of Evolutionary Pressure

We stand at an unprecedented crossroads. Our political choices today determine humanity’s survival over the next century. Systems enabling collective action and planetary problem-solving are essential to our continued existence.

We’ve run out of time. We can no longer retreat into traditional left or right ideologies. Forward is our only viable option.

Cooperation over conquest. Long-term sustainability over short-term exploitation.

We urgently need political frameworks integrating liberal innovation, conservative stability, socialist equality, environmental sustainability, and democratic participation into a coherent, new survival-oriented system.

Every choice you make, every vote cast, every leader you empower affects our collective survival.

Stop treating politics as a spectator sport or identity statement. Your choices directly shape humanity’s collective destiny and the futures of your children and grandchildren.

Ask yourself clearly: Does this vote help my grandchildren survive and thrive, or does it endanger their existence?

We’ve delayed these decisions for too long. The luxury of debate is past. The time for choosing survival is now.

Do it deliberately, courageously, and decisively.

Thank you for reading The Streetlight. My writing is open to all. But if you value fearless, independent insights and are able to support, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. Subscriptions are just eight bucks a month or eighty bucks for the whole year to help this work stay independent and free.

The Streetlight